There is a clear trend among the military branches to opt for pixelated camouflage instead of traditional, but what is the reason behind this change?
Since there is war there is also the need to hide from the enemy. In most cases, it is not necessary to completely disappear, just long enough to deliver the first blow, which can be decisive.
This is why armies around the world invest a lot of time and money in studies that help them understand how the human eye works and how they can trick it. The most obvious solution is not to use one uniform color, but several colors scattered throughout the uniform or vehicle.
Looking for the best way to deceive the human eye
These camouflages usually consist of a base color with patches of different colors scattered throughout the object. The choice of colors is very important, and depends a lot on the area in which you are going to act; but above all, the important thing is to create a pattern that at a certain distance look like leaves, stones or other objects in the environment.
However, in recent years the classic pattern of colored patches is gradually disappearing from battlefields, for a more effective option: pixelated camouflage. This design is based on colored squares, in such a way that the final image is similar to that of the colored patches, as if we were watching it in a retro video game.
The usual camouflage problem is that its effectiveness depends a lot on the distance and the pattern used; A large pattern works best over long distances, while a small pattern is ideal for short distances.
Pixelated camouflage, a natural image to go unnoticed
The interesting thing is that thePixelated camouflage can work at all distances, depending on the colors that are chosen. Up close, pixelated camouflage can be mistaken for tree trunks or leaves, and from a distance squares create a macro texture that allows them to blend in with branches, trees, and terrain shadows.
It seems contradictory that a shape as unnatural as a square is ideal for camouflage in nature, but experience shows that it is successful.
A study of the US Navy revealed that Soldiers wearing a uniform with the pixelated pattern were discovered in 2.5 seconds on average, while those wearing the traditional NATO pattern were discovered in one second. A second and a half can be the difference between attacking first and not, between a successful mission and an absolute failure.
Look at this image. What camouflage are you able to see better?
Pixelated camouflage doesn’t make us invisible
Of course, pixelated camouflage does not work in all situations, and above all, really camouflage pattern doesn’t matter if you don’t use proper colorAnd that is something that surprisingly happens more often than it should.
In the campaign in Afghanistan the American army carried the one known as UCP (Universal Camouflage Pattern), with a pixelated pattern, but they made a big mistake: soldiers excelled in desert environments because the camouflage does not include brown tones.
We had another example last year, when the Chinese army unveiled the camouflage chosen for its fleet of land vehicles and tanks, in a striking range of blues. The truth is that it looks very nice, but experts believe that They would be easy targets on land, and even in amphibious vehicles its usefulness would be doubtful.
There are those who think that the color blue was a hidden message from the government, which may have its sights set on possible naval conflicts, and there are others who think that they only wanted to attract attention with a different image and that vehicles will use a different pattern in operations. real.
Be that as it may, it is a demonstration that pixelated graphics are back in vogue, this time in the war.